
The Ripple vs. SEC case has become one of the most talkedโabout topics on social media. After months of delays and shifting deadlines, many users are wondering how this lawsuit will affect Rippleโs business.
Rumors have been flying on social media that Rippleโs ongoing battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission cost the company huge dealsโsome even claim JP Morgan shifted business to Coinbase, possibly costing Ripple โtrillionsโ in revenue. But the story isnโt quite that simple. Unlike Ripple, Coinbase has not been hit with an injunction or an active lawsuit, so itโs free to continue operating without the same legal cloud hanging over it.
Some XRP supporters have pointed fingers at Judge Analisa Torres, calling her repeated deadline extensions โdisgustingโ and demanding a corruption probe. However, former SEC lawyer James Farrell pushed back on these claims.ย
He explained that if Ripple truly lost business because it was legally enjoined, the company could haveโand perhaps should haveโnoted that loss in its court filings. In fact, Rippleโs own filings argue that it needs โeven footingโ with other market players, a situation they say only exists for firms not enjoined by the court.
Farrell also reminded everyone that both the SECโs appeal and Rippleโs cross-appeal are still active but put on hold. If the stay is lifted, Rippleโs next moves will be to respond to the SECโs appeal and then make its own case on appeal.
Until then, thereโs no clear evidence that Ripple has bled โtrillionsโ of dollars in business, even if side conversations online suggest otherwise. The real test will come when the court decides whether to lift the stay and resume full arguments on both sides.